( September 2020) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message) Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. For the former think it is some plain and obvious thing like pleasure, wealth or honour. Verbally there is a very general agreement for both the general run of men and people of superior refinement say that it is, and identify living well and faring well with being happy but with regard to what is they differ, and the many do not give the same account as the wise. In his Nicomachean Ethics (§21 1095a15–22), Aristotle says that everyone agrees that eudaimonia is the highest good for humans, but that there is substantial disagreement on what sort of life counts as doing and living well i.e. Semantically speaking, the word δαίμων ( daímōn) derives from the same root of the Ancient Greek verb δαίομαι ( daíomai, "to divide") allowing the concept of eudaimonia to be thought of as an "activity linked with dividing or dispensing, in a good way".ĭefinitions, a dictionary of Greek philosophical terms attributed to Plato himself but believed by modern scholars to have been written by his immediate followers in the Academy, provides the following definition of the word eudaimonia: "The good composed of all goods an ability which suffices for living well perfection in respect of virtue resources sufficient for a living creature." In terms of its etymology, eudaimonia is an abstract noun derived from the words eû ('good, well') and daímōn ('dispenser, tutelary deity'), the latter referring maybe to a minor deity or a guardian spirit. 2 Classical views on eudaimonia and aretē.As a result, there are many varieties of eudaimonism. ĭiscussion of the links between ēthikē aretē (virtue of character) and eudaimonia (happiness) is one of the central concerns of ancient ethics, and a subject of much disagreement. It is thus a central concept in Aristotelian ethics and subsequent Hellenistic philosophy, along with the terms aretē (most often translated as ' virtue' or 'excellence') and phronesis ('practical or ethical wisdom'). It is the aim of practical philosophy-prudence, including ethics and political philosophy, to consider and experience what this state really is, and how it can be achieved. In works of Aristotle, eudaimonia was the term for the highest human good in older Greek tradition. For other uses, see Eudaemon (disambiguation).Įudaimonia ( Greek: εὐδαιμονία sometimes anglicized as eudaemonia or eudemonia, / j uː d ɪ ˈ m oʊ n i ə/) is a Greek word literally translating to the state or condition of 'good spirit', and which is commonly translated as ' happiness' or ' welfare'. CitationĢ016.For the moth, see Eudaemonia (moth). Moreover, the ancient philosophers had a distinct view of what constituted such an end-specifically, acting as a philosopher or as an active participant in the life of the city-state. However, while both approaches hold that the rationality of any economic action is dependent on the frugal use of means, contemporary economics is largely neutral between ends, while in ancient economic theory, an action is considered economically rational only when taken towards a praiseworthy end. For example, both Ancient Greek oikonomia and contemporary economics study human behavior as a relationship between ends and means which have alternative uses. It then explores some of the key elements of oikonomia, while offering some comparisons and contrasts with modern economic thought. This article introduces in more detail what the ancient Greek philosophers meant by "oikonomia." It begins with a short history of the word. Nearly every economist has at some point in the standard coursework been exposed to a brief explanation that the origin of the word "economy" can be traced back to the Greek word oikonomia, which in turn is composed of two words: oikos, which is usually translated as "household" and nemein, which is best translated as "management and dispensation." Thus, the cursory story usually goes, the term oikonomia referred to "household management", and while this was in some loose way linked to the idea of budgeting, it has little or no relevance to contemporary economics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |